May 16

 

An official visit to Canada by Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk will reportedly lead to formal co-operation between Polish and Canadian based companies in the area of shale gas.

Polish daily Dziennik Gazeta Prawna reports that Grupa Lotos SA will enter into an agreement withTalisman Energy, to jointly explore unconventional gas concessions held by the Gdansk based company.

PKN Orlen is reportedly to enter into a strategic partnership for shale gas exploration with EnCana Corp, Canada’s largest natural gas producer. The arrangement will allow for joint participation in Poland and in North America

Last summer, it was reported that Orlen and Encana had reached a deal reportedly involving access to Encana’s activities in the U.S. along with a contribution of $200 million USD from Encana to co-finance prospecting works in Poland, in exchange for a stake in Orlen’s concessions in the Lubelskie (Lublin) Basin.  Orlen hold six shale gas concessions in the Lublin region (Bełżyce, Garwolin, Lubartów, Lublin, Wierzbica, Hrubieszów).  However, the joint venture project did not get the green light from the Ministry of Treasury.

Polish natural gas leader PGNiG is reportedly also in discussion with potential co-venturers, but has not reached any firm arrangements to date.

In April, PGNiG and PKN Orlen, the largest refiner in Central Europe, revealed that they has startedtalks over collaboration on oil and gas exploration, in Poland and abroad.

Source: Natural Gas Europe

Tagged with:
May 14

 

Some foreign operators and industry experts involved in Poland’s nascent shale natural gas exploration sector are becoming concerned about the politicization of the industry and a tendency to favor domestic state-controlled companies.

Although Poland remains at the forefront of shale gas exploration in Europe there has been a noticeable politicization of the public debate about the industry since last October’s parliamentary elections. During the campaign, politicians appeared to be competing to reassure the public that their party could extract the most from potential shale gas production.

Firstly, the main opposition party, the nationalist and populist Law and Justice, proposed introducing a minimum 40% royalty fee on future production and new legislation outlawing “undesired investors” from acquiring companies engaged in shale gas activities.

The pro-shale gas and economically liberal Civic Platform party, which won re-election, is now drafting legislation to regulate the industry in the light of that debate.

“One political party was saying to the government, ‘you’re giving away everything to foreigners.’ Politicians don’t want to do the wrong thing but they lack experience and this makes it difficult for them to be a partner with a strong industry,” Pawel Poprawa, until recently a shale gas expert at the Polish Geological Institute, said in an interview.

“It would be much better if this were an industry like the coal industry or food industry. There’s too much politics involved and the industry pays the price, Poprawa said.

Before Christmas, the country’s new Treasury Minister, Mikolaj Budzanowski, gave an indication of the government’s thinking when he wrote to the country’s largest state-controlled companies — natural gas company PGNiG; refiners PKN Orlen and Grupa Lotos; utilities PGE and Tauron; and copper miner KGHM –urging them to enter into partnerships for shale gas exploration. Some of those companies are now finalizing the details of a partnership to develop PGNiG’s Wejherowo shale gas license area in Pomerania, in northern Poland.

PGNiG has 15 shale gas concessions in the country’s Ordovician and Silurian shales, the highest number held by a single company. PKN Orlen has six, while the remainder have none.

No Polish company has the resources to fund the intensive exploration campaign shale gas requires. In Poland, each vertical exploration well costs around $10 million and each horizontal well $15 million, up to three times the cost in the US.

In January, it was reported that months of talks about a partnership between PKN and Canada’s Encana, which would see PKN gain access to Encana’s North American acreage in return for investment in its Polish shale gas concessions, were halted because of an alleged decision by Warsaw to prioritize domestic tie-ups.

One official from a non-Polish shale gas operator in Poland said the division into “them and us” was extremely damaging and was driven by politics.

“In the beginning, foreign companies were made to feel extremely welcome — now there’s a lot of talk about foreign companies coming to exploit us,” the official said.

“The issue here is not about money, it’s skill and know-how. Companies like PGNiG have no experience in shale gas and it was madness to stop the tie-up between Encana and PKN. The signal seems to be that Polish companies should start producing shale gas by the next election [scheduled for 2015]. I can understand it as political propaganda and as a signal to the Russians, but it makes no business nor technological sense.”

Mostly foreign operators have drilled 23 exploration wells since 2010 and are contracted to drill 49 new wells this year. None has yet proved economic, but operators are optimistic that it is only a matter of time.

Although exploration costs are high, a huge incentive is the fact that gas prices are up to seven times higher in Poland than in the US.

So far each operator has adopted a step-by-step approach. They drill a vertical well, analyze the data and then decide whether to fracture the well.

If the results are promising, they may drill a horizontal well, So far, just two horizontal wells have been drilled, both by the Isle of Man-registered independent 3Legs Resources.

PGNiG appears to be considering a different approach. There’s talk it is planning to build a wellpad for 12 wells in its Wejhorowo license area.

“This is a political decision motivated by getting production going as quickly as possible. The problem is PGNiG lacks experience, it doesn’t know how to do shale gas. They had people queuing up to go into partnership with them. But a decision has been taken to try to do it with Polish companies. I’m sure they will learn from their failures,” one industry participant said in an interview.

Piotr Wozniak, the country’s Chief Geologist and deputy environment minister, denies any such decision has been made.

“There is scope for everyone. The Treasury Minister will probably try to incentivize the two or three Polish companies that have the strength to invest because this requires a lot of money. There is not enough money to be leveraged by a Polish company. They are too weak. If we really want to develop these resources we need foreign investors. I don’t think it is a decision by the minister to repel investors from PGNiG. Sooner or later we will see partners with PGNiG, Lotos and PKN Orlen,” Wozniak said.

An atmosphere of uncertainty has arisen just as Wozniak and other ministers are about to announce the first details of new regulations for the industry, including a new hydrocarbons tax set to take effect when first production starts in 2015-16.

Currently Poland has no specific fiscal regime for shale gas. The tax rate for conventional oil and gas production is less than 21% and consists of a corporate income tax, an exploitation fee and a property tax.

“The level of government take in Poland is extremely low and everybody, including investors, expects it to rise. In my opinion, the rise should be very, very moderate because we need those investors here. There are not enough companies; we don’t have an oil industry in Poland at all. It’s in our interest to incentivise rather than dis-incentivise,” Wozniak said.

Although the taxation rate is not yet known, the new fiscal regime will likely include a combination of an exploitation fee, CIT, and the new tax, Maciej Grabowski, deputy finance minister, told Platts.

Grabowski said a total government take of around 50% would be fair, without giving details. But that figure has already caused jitters among operators — head offices have been calling Warsaw asking whether such a tax rate is economical for them.

It’s too early to be talking figures, said Kamlesh Parmar, country manager for 3Legs Resources.

“We now need to look at whether or not any of these areas can be made commercial and that involves a lot more work, a lot more drilling, a lot more testing. That costs money in a global environment where money is difficult to come by. What I would really like to see is the authorities making an effort to encourage investment in this industry so that this potential can be made a reality,” Parmar said in an interview.

Source: Platts

Tagged with:
May 11

 

The Polish Geological Institute  (Państwowy Instytut Geologiczny) will publish its new report on shale gas reserves in late 2013.

Speaking to Natural Gas Europe, Poland’s Deputy Minister of Environment and Chief Geologist Piotr Woźniak emphasised that estimates will be based on data collected from exploratory wells drilled from 2010-2012, by international companies and Polish state-controlled firms.

The previous estimates published by the Polish Geological Institute in March put recoverable reserves of shale gas in Poland at between 346 and 768 billion cubic metres. However, the report was based on archival data, obtained in the second half of the previous century, from wells drilled between the 50s and the 90s.

Mr. Wozniak underlines, that the first PGI report was only a preliminary one. The Chief Geologist, who took the office several months ago adds, that the report “should have been published by his predecessors much earlier, three – four years ago”.

Mr. Wozniak indicated, that this time the Institute will use data from new wells. Under the exploratory concessions regime, companies must pass their data to the ministry till March 2013.

The Chief Geologist predicted that a new report, using those new measurements, will be ready for publication at the end of 2013. He added that in that new report, higher estimates should be expected.

Source: Natural Gas Europe

Tagged with:
May 08

 

The Schuman Foundation conference on “Expectations and Reality: What’s next for Shale Gas ?” took place in the European Parliament Information Office in Warsaw on 16 April 2012. The main theme of the discussion was the future of unconventional gas in Poland and Europe following the recently published Polish PGI shale gas reserve estimates and the European Parliament’s Environment, Public Health and Food Safety Committee (ENVI) report on the environmental impacts of shale gas.

Among the experts invited were MEP Boguslaw Sonik  and MEP Boguslaw Liberadzki,  Professor Jan Lubal and Dr. Piotr Kasza of Polish Oil and Gas Institute, and Chemical Substances Inspector Jerzy Majka.

Referring to the ENVI report,  MEP Boguslaw Sonik, report rapporteur, explained that while the document had no direct legislative power, it was very important for the future of shale gas in the European Union. In his opinion, the unconventional gas debate in Europe, which started two years ago, is based largely on myth and fear, hence the need for the European Parliament to adopt an official stance on the issue.

MEP Boguslaw Liberadzki said that in terms of the energy industry’s needs, there were three key requirements to make the environment competitive in the European Union: sustainable economic development, the cost of energy production and, most importantly, agreement among the EU member states. He suggested that shale gas could bring member states together but appealed for the debate on this issue to be less based on emotion and more based on fact. Poland, he continued, should highlight that without shale gas it would be forced to rely on nuclear energy.

Speaking about the potential problems that may arise during shale gas extraction, Professor Jerzy Majka highlighted that accidents cannot be avoided making it necessary for appropriate safety monitoring systems to be put in place. He added that exploration companies should disclose the chemical used in hydraulic fracturing fluids to authorities.

Tagged with:
May 08

 

Germany and the U.K., Europe’s two largest consumers of natural gas, are likely to lean ever more heavily on the fuel to meet energy needs in the coming years, as the expansion of low-carbon nuclear and renewable power falls short of their needs.

This extra demand would probably be met by high-priced imports, such as gas brought in from Russia via pipelines or liquefied natural gas from the Middle East and Africa. For a continent already grappling with its long-term competitiveness, this could be bad news. “Low prices for natural gas offer manufacturing a powerful competitive advantage, potentially stimulating much broader economic growth,” said Mark Williams, downstream director for energy giant Royal Dutch Shell PLC.

The U.S. is enjoying just that, thanks to a boom in production of natural gas trapped in shale rock. In Europe, there are hopes that its shale-gas resources could eventually help it at least partially mimic the U.S. The big shift that is pushing the U.K. and Germany toward greater dependence on gas is the decline in nuclear power.

After the Japanese earthquake and tsunami triggered a meltdown at the Fukushima nuclear-power plant last year, the German government decided to close all of its nuclear reactors, which produce 13 gigawatts of power, or the equivalent of 8% of Germany’s energy-generating capacity, by 2022. This coincides with the end of life spans for all but one of the U.K.’s reactors by 2023 that will leave just 1.2 gigawatts of capacity of the 11 gigawatts that they currently produce.

Several European and British utilities have planned to build 16 gigawatts of new nuclear reactors, but some projects are now in doubt as their backers say it is uncertain that these plants can operate profitably given current electricity prices.

German utilities E.ON AG and RWE AG have abandoned a joint venture to build new nuclear plants with a combined capacity of 6 gigawatts because they lacked the capital to finance the work and external financing was scarce.

In February, U.K. utility Scottish and Southern Energy SSE.LN +0.23% PLC quit a consortium with GDF Suez SA and Iberdrola SA IBE.MC -1.59% to build plants with 3.6 gigawatts of planned new nuclear capacity in order to focus on renewable energy. GDF Suez and Iberdrola say they remain committed, but analysts say the projects are more doubtful. A major expansion of coal power would cause countries to miss their carbon-reduction targets, and it seems unlikely that renewable energy could quickly fill this gap. “Most clean energy technologies are not being deployed quickly enough, [and] are not on track to make their required contribution,” the International Energy Agency said in a report last month.

German Chancellor Angela Merkel has said an additional 10 gigawatts of gas-fired power plants will be built by 2022 to fill the gap left by shuttered nuclear plants. In the U.K., even the most optimistic scenario for the use of nuclear power leaves a 6-gigawatt hole to be filled, most likely by gas. Assuming the most efficient gas-fired power plants were built, replacing these reactors would add around 14 billion cubic meters a year to European gas demand, equivalent to almost 3% of 2010 EU gas consumption. This figure could rise further if the U.K. government can’t come up with stronger financial support for new nuclear projects.

Meeting this extra demand could prove expensive. Pipeline gas from Russia is priced on a formula tied to crude oil, so is relatively expensive. Goldman Sachs expects oil-indexed natural gas on continental Europe to sell at an average price of $13.60 per million British thermal units this year, a 24% premium to the market price in the U.K., which gets around half its gas from the North Sea. Rising demand for LNG from Asia is also pushing up prices.

The amount of LNG available to the U.K. in the first quarter of 2012 halved from the same period a year earlier, after the country was outbid by Asian customers, and it had to import more oil-indexed gas to compensate, said Barclays analyst Trevor Sikorski. “We expect the LNG market to increasingly tighten as we go through the next few years,” he said. However, recent developments in the gas industry mean this is by no means set in stone.

Many companies believe the U.K. and Germany’s neighbor Poland may hold resources that would enable them to at least partially mimic the boom in shale gas production that has pushed U.S. gas prices to 10-year lows. Industry analysts say there are still questions over how cheaply and quickly these resources could be tapped. “Forget about straight-line forecasts for natural gas demand and supply,” said Anne-Sophie Corbeau, a senior gas analyst at the International Energy Agency. Shale gas opens the way for “patterns [to] suddenly diverge from the conventional view in the most unexpected way.”

Source: The Wall Street Journal

Tagged with:
May 08

 

Poland has no plans to follow the example of several European countries that introduced moratoriums on shale gas exploration and will continue its efforts to tap unconventional energy sources to limit its dependence on costly Russian supplies.

The Czech Republic said on Monday it was planning a two-year moratorium on granting licences for shale gas exploration to put required legislation in place.

Countries like France and Bulgaria have already halted exploration due to environmental concerns related to a drilling method known as fracking, which uses large amounts of fresh water and chemicals to extract shale gas.

“The government is not planning any shale gas moratorium,” Tomasz Arabski, the head of the prime minister’s office, told a news conference on Tuesday before a government sitting.

Poland has granted more than 100 exploration licences to its state-controlled companies as well as global majors such as Chevron and Exxon Mobil. It has estimated its shale reserves at 346 billion to 768 billion cubic metres (bcm).

The country has so far strongly pushed the companies it controls to join forces and explore its shale gas deposits. It expects first shale gas production at the turn of 2014 and 2015.

Source: Reuters

Tagged with:
May 08

 

The South Stream natural gas pipeline project through the Black Sea is a Russian-EU partnership.

“Often our project is perceived as a purely Russian enterprise. In fact, it’s based on parity,” Sebastian Sass, Head of Communications & Spokesperson, South Stream Transport AG said.

South Stream Transport AG is in charge of planning and constructing the offshore section of South Stream, from Russia to Bulgaria. “That’s the competence and task of our company. The offshore crossing through the Black Sea is the key link, connecting the world’s largest gas sources in Russia with the consumers in the EU. We believe it’s in both sides’ interest that this is based on parity.”

The task of constructing the offshore section of the South Stream natural gas pipeline is a complex and ambitious endeavor.

“Comprising a 900 km underwater pipeline from Russia to Bulgaria through the Black Sea it will reach a maximum depth of 2,500 meters. When fully operational, the pipeline will have a capacity of 63 billion cubic meters per year, comprising four lines,” he said.

South Stream Transport AG, the company responsible for the planning, construction, and subsequent operation of the offshore gas pipeline through the Black Sea, was established in October of last year in Zug, Switzerland.

South Stream Transport AG’s Board of Directors, which had recently been appointed, has six members: “Three of which are from our Russian shareholder; three of which come from our EU-based shareholders and the interesting thing is that this really does reflect the fact that South Stream Transport is a project based on genuine parity between the Russian partner and the EU partners. The shareholding is divided accordingly and this is reflected in the composition of our board.”

He reported that 50% of South Stream Transport AG was owned by the Russian company OAO Gazprom; the Italian company Eni S.p.A. acquired a 20% stake; the French energy company EDF and the German company Wintershall Holding GmbH (BASF Group) had acquired 15% each.

“Russian gas deliveries to Europe have been stable for more than 40 years. Even during the Cold War, gas supplies from Russia have been uninterrupted. This proves that Russia is a stable and reliable gas supplier,” said Mr. Sass.

“The relative share of Russian gas in EU imports now stands at half of its 1980 level, despite the fact that total imports from Russia have grown,” he explained. “This shows that sources have been successfully diversified, with new suppliers entering the market such as Norway and Algeria. Today’s deliveries of Russian gas use in majority the same routes as in the 1980s. While the first line of the Nord Stream Pipeline started delivering gas into the European grid in November 2011, there is a clear need for yet more diversification.”

He added that the South Stream offshore crossing through the Black Sea did provide for diversification of routes and provided additional capacity.

“Growth demands have been revised,” he said. “While European gas consumption is rising, the region’s domestic production is declining. The revision of energy policies in some EU countries will somehow need to be compensated and renewables are not in a position to cover that fully.”

Mr. Sass reported that the Consolidated Feasibility Study for the South Stream offshore section had been completed.“We have the ambitious target to come to an FID (Final Investment Decision) and to start the construction of the South Stream Offshore Pipeline by the end of this year,” he said.

“We aim to be delivering gas by the end of 2015 through the first of four offshore pipelines. There will be altogether four, which will be taken into operation subsequently and our main aim is to deliver gas within that timeline.

“The milestones that we need to achieve ahead of that are all aiming at making this particular objective of delivering gas within that timeframe possible,” he continued.

Meanwhile, South Stream Transport AG has also recently launched its website.

“The website will be a tool to implement transparent communications. Currently, we’ve launched it in English and Russian but it will be expanded into a number of languages, and also as the project progresses there will be more detailed information on the project as such, on the Environmental and Social Impact Assessments for example,” he said.

Mr. Sass emphasized the importance of providing information about such energy projects as South Stream.

“With the launch of our website, we are initiating a proactive and timely information exchange with all interested stakeholder groups. We are committed to transparency and openness. Our website will be an essential element to fulfill our commitment,” he explained.

Source: Natural Gas Europe

Tagged with:
May 04

 

Algeria sees “big potential” for shale gas and plans incentives to encourage exploration as extraction of so-called unconventional resources becomes economically feasible, according to an Oil Ministry official.

Algeria will introduce new legislation to spur investment in exploration this year, including tax incentives that “take account of the production difficulties of this kind of fuel,” said Ali Hached, an adviser to Energy and Mines Minister Youcef Yousfi. “There is big potential,” he said at a Paris summit.

Countries from the U.S. to Poland are exploring for natural gas in shale, which requires the injection of water, sand and chemicals into sedimentary rock at high pressure to extract the fuel. Energy producers have stepped up the search for such unconventional resources as rising energy prices and advances in technology have made such developments profitable.

“Non-conventional resources are important in Algeria,” Abdelhamid Zerguine, chief executive officer of state-run energy company Sonatrach Group, said at today’s summit. Tests in three provinces over 180,000 square kilometers (69,500 square miles) have uncovered a possible 2 trillion cubic meters of gas, he said, adding that “partnerships will be necessary.”

Sonatrach has said it intends to invest $80 billion over five years, with more than 60 percent dedicated to exploration and production. The company plans to drill 150 exploratory wells and expand crude-processing capacity at three oil refineries.

Development of unconventional gas resources outside North America will “take time,” Yves-Louis Darricarrere, head of exploration and production at French oil company Total SA, said in Paris. Total, which is producing shale gas in the U.S. with Chesapeake Energy Corp., is developing the Timimoun and Ahnet gas projects in Algeria and pursuing projects in China.

Source: Bloomberg

Tagged with:
May 03

 

There is no need for more environmental legislation in the case of shale gas exploration, at least until it reaches commercial scale, says a new study published by the European commission.

The activities relating to exploration of shale gas are already subject to EU and national laws and regulations, says the report, carried out for the European commission by Belgian law firm Philippe & Partners.

Water protection issues, for instance, which have been raised as an issue by shale gas detractors, are already covered by EU legislation under the Water Framework Directive, the Groundwater Directive and the Mining Waste Directive. Meanwhile, the use of chemicals is covered by the REACH regulation, the study says.

“It is a new technology and we do not have a specific legislation on shale gas, because it is so new,” said Marlene Holzner, European commission spokesperson on energy.

“So the study only says that the existing regulations are applicable for shale gas, that the tool is there and has only to be applied,” she told EurActiv, adding that the study was carried out only in four countries – Poland, France, Germany and Sweden. It was released on 27 January.

The law firm said shale gas activities were too small at the moment to justify specific legislation. “Neither on the European level nor on the national level have we noticed significant gaps in the current legislative framework, when it comes to regulating the current level of shale gas activities,” the study says.

This is, however, not a reason for “complacency”, the study says, since the assessment refers only to the current scale of operations in Europe. Shale gas exploitation on a commercial scale would involve bigger maneuvers, it adds.

Europe has less experience in exploring shale gas formations as a new source of natural gas and no commercial scale exploitations have taken place yet, but this “is expected in a few years’ time”, the report says.

Shale gas is an unconventional source of natural gas and studies show different results on how safe the two main methods of extracting it from rock formations.

One is the horizontal drilling in various regions of the rock, which is needed to capture the gas pockets. The other, hydraulic fracturing – or ‘fracking’ – involves a high-pressure injunction of fluids usually mixed with chemicals into shale rock. Both of them require seismic and drilling permits, as well as large amounts of chemicals and water.

Only after conducting consecutive tests for drilling and fracturing does a project reach the stage of planning and acquiring the needed pipeline, followed by the decision to bring the extraction to a commercial scale.

In a few years’ time, investors might find themselves in need of making a decision on the commercial development of their shale gas projects, a situation which is not covered by the EU study published on 27 January.

Poland, which aims to shrug off its dependency on Russian gas, is planning to begin commercial shale gas production from 2014, Prime Minister Donald Tusk said last year. Most of the projects are currently at the phase of seismic surveys and some projects already have entered the drilling phase, which is expected to intensify after 2014.

The natural gas trapped in shale rock in Poland could provide the country with enough fuel to last for 300 years, the US Department of Energy said last year.

However, not everyone is willing to allow drilling operations on their land, despite the economic potential. At the beginning of January, thousands of Bulgarians protested against exploration for shale gas over fears it could poison underground water, trigger earthquakes and pose serious public health hazards.

Source: The Guardian
Tagged with:
May 03

The Financial Times published a special report on the potential of shale gas to undermine the concept of ‘peak oil’, reshape domestic economies as “one of the linchpins of global energy supply in the 21st century” and recast geopolitics, influencing companies’ investment decisions.

With quantifiable shale reserves now having been identified in Argentina, Australia, South Africa, northern Africa and eastern Europe, as well as in the UK and France, the US Energy Information Administration now estimates these could raise recoverable global gas resources by more than 40 per cent. The author stresses the economic and environmental potential of shale gas as it could improve energy security vis-à-vis Russia, and improve global carbon emissions should China decide to switch from coal. He concludes that the “promise of energy independence, job creation and cheaper power will spur many governments to push ahead.

Source: EuropeUnconventionalGas.Org

Tagged with:
preload preload preload