Nov 01

 

The development of the extraction of gas is a potential game-changer in world energy markets, offering ample supplies in markets that could otherwise tighten in coming years.

In the United States, hydraulic fracturing, a recently developed method of shale gas procurement, has the potential to flip the country from a net importer of natural gas to a net exporter.

Shale gas now accounts for one quarter of all U.S. gas production, and the Energy Information Administration (EIA) forecasts that this proportion will double by 2035.

In Europe, according to a study by IHS Cambridge Energy Research Associates, production levels from unconventional gas sources including shale could range from 60 billion cubic metres (bcm), less than half of current shale gas production in North America, to 200 bcm by 2025.

Below is a summary of key facts and challenges around existing and potential shale gas extraction.

Shale is soft, finely stratified sedimentary rock that formed from consolidated mud or clay.

Hydraulic fracturing, known as fracking, is the process of creating small cracks, or fractures, in underground rock formations as much as 7,700 metres below ground level to extract gas (and oil) from shale.

Before fracking for gas begins, geoscientists assess the permeability and porosity of rock formations and thickness of the targeted shale formation.

Once a potential site has been chosen, a hole is drilled deep into the ground vertically and then horizontally, placing frack plugs into the shaft.

A liquid mixture including large amounts of water, chemicals and sand is then pumped into the well.

The liquid goes into the holes created in the well bore and into the surrounding rock formations, fracking the rock and injecting the liquid into the cracks to hold them open.

Water pressure is reduced and fluids are carried up the well bore for disposal or treatment and reuse, leaving sand in place to keep the cracks open and let gas flow up to the surface.

Although shale technology offers large amounts of potential energy resources, it may not be viable in some regions due to political, environmental, legal and economic difficulties.

According to research from the University of Pittsburgh, use of hydraulic fracking to extract shale gas is extremely expensive.

Drilling just a single shale gas well can add $2.5 million to the overall total cost for a conventional well of up to $7.6 million on average, according to the research.

In the United States it is estimated that prices of $5.50 per million British thermal units (Btu) to $6/mBtu are needed for shale gas production to be economically sensible.

In Europe, shale gas would compete with conventional sources of gas supplies and liquefied natural gas (LNG) imports, and many analysts predict shale extraction will remain too expensive in Europe to compete with these sources.

The Economist Intelligence Unit forecasts that climbing U.S. demand means that the price of gas will rise over 20 per cent in 2012 and 8 per cent the following year, pushing prices up by late 2012 or 2013 towards $6 per million Btu.

Environmentalists in the United States say potential water contamination caused by fracking is a major cause for concern.

Chemical-laced fracking fluid can seep through rock fissures into local water wells, and escaping methane from poorly cemented wells and fluid can spill into local rivers and streams, they say.

Fracking requires the treatment of fluids that flow back to the surface after the process is complete. U.S. companies now reuse much of the returned fluid, but they need a large water treatment capacity to return the liquid to an acceptable grade.

Those on the production side say chemical spills are unlikely and that there is no proof fracking causes flammable tap water experienced in Colorado and Pennsylvania.

They also say shale gas is a useful way of cutting carbon emissions, producing little more than half as much CO2 per unit of energy as coal, although some research suggests methane is a worse pollutant.

In April a blowout of a well in Pennsylvania led to fluid spilling into local waterways, heightening the debate about the safety of fracking fluid.

U.S. authorities such as those in New Jersey have banned fracking, helping to fuel opposition in other countries. In May 2011, the French government banned hydraulic fracturing on the basis of environmental concerns, in effect nullifying exploration licenses issued in 2010 to Schuepbach Energy and Total.

Europe also faces legal battles on property rights.

While U.S. landowners also own the resources in the ground, Europeans generally do not have the right to privately sell commodities found on their land.

Source: Vancouver Sun

Tagged with:
Oct 28

 

Sterling Resources Inc. is interested in exploring shale-gas blocks in the southern Romanian region of Oltenia.

Alexandru Patruti, head of the Bucharest-based Mineral Resources Agency, disclosed the information while speaking at an energy conference today in Bucharest.

Any company that has permits to explore oil and gas in the country may also explore resources of unconventional gas, Patruti said.

In July 2010, Chevron Corp submitted winning bids for three shale-gas exploration blocks in the south-eastern region of Dobrogea, totaling 2,700 square kilometers. The company also has exploration rights for a block in Barlad (Eastern Romania). MOL Group has also expressed an interest in searching for unconventional gas in the nation.

Sterling today announced that it had reached agreement with the Government of Romania on a package of issues that will resolve the notice of dispute filed on June 20th, 2011.

At a meeting with Ion Ariton , Minister of Economy, Commerce and Business Environment and the President of the National Agency of Mineral Resources (NAMR), an agreement was reached to grant assignments to Sterling’s designated partners, PetroVentures International Ltd. (20%) and Gas Plus (15%).

In addition, the Government will confirm that all of Sterling’s offshore licenses will now initially run to May 2014 with two further extension periods, each of three years in duration. The Company and NAMR now expect to finalize the administration of this resolution within 10 days.

“While we must still receive the final documentation on the agreements reached, we can confirm that meetings held today in Bucharest herald a new era in our future plans in Romania. The recent amendment to the Construction Permit Law, the granting of assignments and a resolution on our license periods will enable Sterling to resume work activities and investments in the Romanian Black Sea,” stated Mike Azancot, Sterling’s President and CEO.

In April, Sterling has declared Force Majeure on its Midia and Pelican Blocks in the Black Sea after it was unable to undertake operations for reasons it said were outside of its control.  Sterling claimed that lack of clarity on the applicable procedure and authority for issuance of construction permits constituted Force Majeure under its Concession Agreement.

Source: Natural Gas for Europe

Tagged with:
Oct 27

 

Poland will get an additional incentive to push forward with shale gas projects if Russia’s Gazprom refuses to lower multi-year gas prices, Deputy Prime Minister Waldemar Pawlak said on Wednesday.

Polish gas monopoly PGNiG said it would seek an agreement with Gazprom by end-October on a price cut under their long-term deal and, if unsuccessful, would then turn to an arbitrage court.

“Some activity on the government level would certainly do no harm to signal our expectations,” Pawlak, who also serves as the energy minister, told Reuters.

Poland imports some two-thirds of its annual gas consumption of 14 billion cubic metres from Russia, and diversification of supplies has for long been high on Warsaw’s agenda, with its focus lately turning to potential shale gas exploration.

“Our agreement runs until 2022, and by then with relatively good technical capabilities, there will be a chance to match demand with shale gas supply, and this is a new element in the discussion. We can either buy cheaper conventional gas or move quicker on shale gas extraction,” Pawlak said.

Poland hopes to start shale gas production as soon as in 2014 after a study by the U.S. Energy Information Administration estimated it could have some 5.3 trillion cubic metres of recoverable reserves, though that has not been confirmed so far.

The government granted over 100 exploration licences, and three companies recently said they had hit some shale gas deposits.

Source: Reuters

 

Tagged with:
Oct 21

 

The future of natural gas exploration in the UK is constantly changing – here, one reporter shines a light on just how much gas could be lying under the ground.

It has long been gathering momentum across the Pond, with first exploration having occurred in the 1970s, leading to an increasingly important source of natural gas for the country. In 2000, the US recovered just 1% of its gas from shale; today that figure stands closer to 30%.

Little wonder, then, that the UK’s ears have pricked up at the suggestion that this source of energy could help to offset the decline in more conventional sources.

“A decline in domestic production is already well underway in the UK, with volume dropping by 9% annually on average since 2004. Even in the Netherlands, one of Europe’s largest exporters, gas production will likely begin to fall towards the end of the decade,” explained a commodity analyst at Deutsche Bank.

“Recent estimates of the total reserves contained in UK shale-gas deposits hold out the hope that the decline in UK production could be slowed in coming years.”

Cuadrilla Resources announced last month the discovery of 200 trillion cubic feet of gas in Lancashire, noting that commercial production could start as soon as mid-2013.

With huge swathes of the country now up for grabs in a new round of gas exploration licences, interest in unconventional gas has reached fever pitch.

The British Geological Survey has estimated the UK shale-gas reserve potential at 150 billion cubic metres (bcm), while the US Energy Information Administration (EIA) estimated technically recoverable reserves at 560bcm in April.

“The potential for unconventional gas is far higher than that of conventional gas,” said John Westwood, chairman of Douglas-Westwood. “I believe unconventional gas drilling and production is going to soar.”

And in a boon for the industry, the UK government’s position on unconventional gas is positive for shale-gas prospects.

The UK Environment Agency has previously reviewed and approved drilling plans in the Bowland Basin, while Charles Hendry, minister of state for the Department of Energy and Climate Change, has been a vocal supporter of unconventional gas exploration for its potential in increasing energy security.

But it doesn’t come without its complications.

Shale gas, the by-product of shale rock, has come under fire from protestors for being environmentally unsound.

Campaign groups have expressed concern over the effect hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, will have on the environment, as it involves the high-pressure blasting of rocks with a mixture of water, sand and chemicals.

There is also considerable uncertainty regarding the size of the recoverable resource and the production rates that could be sustained.

And in addition, one must take into account the expense. European shale-gas ventures are looking at high well costs in the region of $6.5 million (c£4.1 million) to as much as $14 million, in comparison to $4 million in Pennsylvania.

“As exploration investment rises, new drilling companies enter the market, and competition increases, costs are likely to fall. However, we would be hesitant to claim that this would necessarily reduce costs to the level of current US projects since labour costs, health and safety regulations, and more stringent environmental requirements may result in a persistently higher cost base,” said Deutsche Bank.

Owing to advantages in drilling services infrastructure, mineral-rights law and population density, the US is arguably better equipped to develop shale-gas resources.

But this won’t stop the UK and its European compatriots.

Deutsche Bank concludes: “Overall we believe that shale-gas developments worldwide have the potential to add meaningfully to gas production in the long term, provided that the industry can allay environmental fears and cost-effectively minimise the impact felt by local populations.”

Source: Interactive Investor

Tagged with:
Sep 29

 

3Legs Resources has given an operational update on Lebien LE-2H and Warblino LE-1H wells.  It said the initial testing phase at Lebien LE-2H had now concluded.  The well flowed with the aid of the nitrogen lift at a net natural gas rate of approximately 450-520 mscf/d up to 25 September, and is now in the process of being shut in pending further analysis.

Depending on the results of further analysis the well may be further flow tested.  At Warblino LE-1H, the pilot well was drilled to target depth of 3,222m with extensive coring and logging programmes.

Key Points

Lebien LE-2H

  • The initial testing phase is now concluded
  • The well achieved its objectives of a sustained gas production rate and data gathering to advance the Company’s understanding of the reservoir
  • Natural gas flowed with the aid of nitrogen lift at an initial unstabilised rate of 2,200 mscf/d on 8 September, declining to 500 mscf/d on 13 September.
  • A tubing string was added on 17 September and the well continued to flow with the aid of a nitrogen lift to recover frac water, with natural gas recommencing flow at an initial rate of approximately 380 mscf/d
  • The well has continued to flow with the aid of the nitrogen lift at a net natural gas rate of approximately 450-520 mscf/d up to 25 September
  • The well is now in the process of being shut in pending further analysis
  • Depending on the results of further analysis the well may be further flow tested

Warblino LE-1H

  • Vertical pilot well drilled to TD of 3,222 metres with extensive coring and logging programmes
  • In addition to the intervals completed at Lebien LE-1 and Lebien LE-2H, this well encountered a separate deeper interval
  • The well was sidetracked to drill a horizontal borehole in this deeper interval
  • After drilling a 1,246 metre horizontal lateral of shale with strong gas shows, and just prior to reaching planned total depth, the well encountered hole stability issues
  • A sidetrack was then initiated to redrill the same section
  • The new lateral was drilled to 3,844 metres (measured depth) with a 500 metre horizontal section. This was a shorter horizontal section than originally planned so as to reduce the risk of encountering hole problems
  • Well will shortly be made ready for well stimulation programme and test in due course

 

In addition to the intervals completed at Lebien LE-1 and Lebien LE-2H, this well encountered a separate deeper interval, and the well was sidetracked to drill a horizontal borehole in this deeper interval.  After drilling a 1,246m horizontal lateral of shale with strong gas shows, and just prior to reaching planned total depth, the well encountered hole stability issues, so another sidetrack was then initiated to redrill the same section.

CEO Peter Clutterbuck said: “We are delighted to have successfully executed the multi-stage hydraulic fracture stimulation along the lateral section of the Lebien LE-2H well and achieved encouraging natural gas flow-rates.

“Our interpretation of logs conducted after the frac operation indicates that the frac propagated to a portion of the reservoir in each of the 13 stages, but not to all of the reservoir.  We will be reviewing frac designs with the intention of improving frac performance on future wells.  This well has provided us with invaluable information do to this and to improve reservoir deliverability.  Our objectives with this well were to achieve a sustained gas production rate, and to gather data to further understand the reservoir.  We are very pleased to have achieved both these objectives on our first attempt.  We are encouraged by the characteristics of the new shale interval we have encountered in the Warblino LE-1H horizontal well and believe this represents a promising additional target in the basin.  We look forward to the test results of this well programme, scheduled for later this year.”

Source: Stockmarket Wire

 

Tagged with:
Sep 28

 

Exxon Mobil will begin fracking at a second shale gas well in Poland next week after it recently finished the process at a more advanced well, a local operations board member for the global oil major said on Wednesday.

“We have finished hydraulic fracturing operations on our Krupe 1 well, and next week will start fracturing on our Siennica 1 well,” Jim Johnston said at the European Unconventional Gas Summit.

Johnston added it was too early to say when results of the fracturing procedures will be known and talk about any decisions on further steps.

Exxon Mobil owns six licenses in Poland, two of them in the Lublin basin in central Poland together with Total and four in the Podlasie basin in eastern parts of the country co-owned with independent exploration and production company Hutton.

“With our acreage position, we have access to two out of three of Poland’s most prospective unconventional gas basins,” Johnston added.

According to a recent study by the U.S. Energy Information Administration, Poland’s technically recoverable reserves of shale gas are the biggest in Europe at an estimated 5.3 trillion cubic metres.

Poland has awarded over 90 licenses for exploration of unconventional gas in Poland, with many heavyweights including Exxon Mobil and Chevron interested in investing alongside local players such as PGNiG .

Source: Reuters

Tagged with:
Sep 20

 

Polish Oil and Gas Company (PGNiG) has announced the technical production of shale gas from its concession at Pn Lubocinie near Wejherowo.

The Polish Prime Minster was amongst representatives of PGNiG and government, who took part in what was called a “landmark event” for Poland.

PGNiG provided Natural Gas Europe with a photograph of what is indicated as a continuously burning flare (“candle”) at the Lubocino-1 well.

PGNiG said that analyses of gas from the Silurian and Ordovician shale have confirmed positive initial indications including the lack of hydrogen sulfide and low in nitrogen. Additionally, the analysis confirms the presence of heavy hydrocarbons.

PGNiG SA is now preparing to drill horizontal holes and fracturing treatments for the concession. This work is expected to take at least several months.

Should activities proceed as planned, PGNiG will start a test operation in the second half of 2013, with commercial production will begin in 2014.

PGNiG commenced exploratory drilling for shale gas near to Wejherowo last December, with the drilling of a vertical borehole with a depth of about 3.5 kilometers.

Drilling concluded in March.  At that time, PGNiG deputy head Marek Karabula commented that indications were encouraging and the company planned to spend the next few months testing the outcome of the exploration.

PGNiG currently holds 15 concessions for exploration of shale gas. In its statement, PGNiG said that it plans to acquire further concessions.

The company also holds several concessions for tight gas in the region of Wielkopolska.

The company said that it was currently preparing to start drilling on the next concession Bingley, Royal Lubycza.

Source: Natural Gas for Europe

 

Tagged with:
Sep 06

 

Prime Minister Vladimir Putin has said that Russia would begin pumping the first gas through the Nord Stream pipeline on Tuesday, with European clients receiving gas supplies next month or in November.

“Tomorrow we will start pumping technical gas near Vyborg,” Putin said on Monday.

“Gradually, in a calm manner we are departing from the diktat of transit states,” Putin remarked, alluding to past and present difficulties with Ukraine, through which 90 percent of Russian gas to Europe transits.

Nord Stream consists of two 1,224 kilometre natural gas pipelines through the Baltic Sea, linking Europe to Russian gas reserves. When fully operational in the last quarter of 2012, the twin pipeline system will supply 55 billion cubic metres (bcm) of gas annually.

Source: Natural Gas for Europe

Tagged with:
Aug 31

 

Geoffrey Styles, Managing Director of GSW Strategy Group, LLC, an energy and environmental strategy consulting firm, has posted on The Energy Collective, the combined findings of different studies into the environmental impact of shale exploration and extraction:

For most of this year the enormous potential of shale gas has been clouded by controversy over its alleged climate impact. This began with the draft and later the leaked pre-publication version of a paper from a Cornell professor suggesting that the greenhouse gas emissions from gas were no better than those from coal and might even be worse. When I examined Dr. Howarth’s analysis in two postings last December and this April I found that his methodology and assumptions were sufficiently flawed to undermine his conclusions. However, I also recognized the informal nature of my assessment and suggested the need for further scrutiny of this issue by organizations with more resources. That has now taken place, though I claim no credit for it. Within the last month three separate teams have issued reports bearing on this question, and not one of them validates Dr. Howarth’s findings against shale gas.
The first of these studies comes from IHS Cambridge Energy Research Associates, addressing not just Dr. Howarth’s paper, but also the EPA’s estimates of methane leakage that were a key input for its calculations of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from shale gas. Although a skeptic might find reasons to dismiss a study from a consultancy with a large energy industry clientele, the other two studies have connections to groups with unimpeachable environmental/sustainability credentials.

One is a collaboration between Worldwatch Institute and Deutsche Bank, while the other paper, published in Environmental Research Letters, is from a team at Carnegie Mellon University with financial support from the Sierra Club. I encourage you to read them, but here are the highlights:

The Carnegie Mellon team focused on shale gas from the vast Marcellus formation underlying several eastern states.  They found that while the current techniques for developing and completing a Marcellus shale gas well do result in higher methane emissions than from conventional gas wells, the extra methane only increases lifecycle GHG emissions from well to burner tip by 3% on average. This is the case because, “The life cycle emissions are dominated by combustion that accounts for 74% of the total emissions.” As a result, when burned in a combined cycle power plant to generate electricity, shale gas results in emissions per kilowatt-hour (kWh) that are 20-50% lower than those from coal, depending on equipment and sources.

This is the crucial comparison that Howarth’s paper gave short shrift. They also compared shale gas emissions to those from LNG, which we’d now be importing in large quantities had shale gas development not ramped up as it did a few years ago. The Mellon team found shale gas and LNG roughly comparable, with both emitting around a quarter less CO2 equivalent per BTU than diesel fuel. That suggests that shale gas isn’t just a lower-emitting fuel for power generation, but also for transportation.

Finally, they looked at the possibility of shale gas wells being fractured multiple times, rather than just once during their production life, and found that it would take more than 25 fracturing events to negate gas’s advantage over coal.

The Worldwatch/Deutsche Bank study considered both top-down and bottom-up views of shale gas emissions, including that of Howarth. They looked at the average US natural gas supply including current proportions of shale gas and found that the emissions from gas-fired power plants beat coal-fired plants by an average of 47%, even with the EPA’s higher figures for methane venting during gas production.

They also found that among bottom-up assessments of shale gas emissions, including the one from Carnegie Mellon and another from the DOE’s National Energy Technology Laboratory, Howarth’s results appear to be an outlier, and that shale gas is materially lower than coal in lifecycle emissions for power generation. And while their analysis was performed using the standard 100-year global warming potential for methane of 25 times CO2, they considered sensitivities ranging up to a GWP of 105:1, at which extreme gas still performed better than coal.

It’s probably too much to hope that these independent studies will alleviate all of the concerns that have been raised about the greenhouse gas emissions from shale gas, which will only improve as technology and standards progress. (The studies also highlighted both the need and potential to reduce methane emissions from shale gas development, in order to minimize the extra greenhouse gas contribution, irrespective of any comparison to other fuels.) I also get that with the current mood in much of this country, claims for the game-changing energy potential of shale gas must sound too good to be true, without some fatal flaw.

Yet everything I see indicates that the problems associated with shale gas development are all manageable, and that while it isn’t a panacea, it does represent an extraordinary opportunity for the US from an economic, energy security and environmental perspective. It’s time to recognize this as the tremendous gift that it is.

Source: The Energy Collective

Tagged with:
Aug 24

 

The Wall Street Journal published this account detailing the challenges of finding a qualified labour force when it comes to shale gas exploration:

If Poland is to develop its reserves of shale gas, the material that has created an energy bonanza in the U.S., one of its biggest obstacles is likely to be securing a qualified labor force, industry participants say.

“There are about 1,000 shale jobs in Poland right now, but there will be 50,000 to 100,000 in the next 10 years,” says Jakub Kostecki, chief executive of New Gas Contracting, a Warsaw recruiting firm.

Wieslaw Prugar, chief executive of Orlen Upstream, cites a “qualified” labor force as one of the serious challenges Poland will need to address to develop its unconventional natural-gas reserves and has called the issue a “bottleneck.” Orlen Upstream is a subsidiary of state-controlled refiner PKN Orlen SA (PKN.WA).

Poland has recoverable shale-gas resources of 5.3 trillion cubic meters, equal to more than 300 years of the country’s annual natural-gas consumption, the U.S. Department of Energy says in a report.

While testing is still being conducted on Poland’s shale rock–which lies about four kilometers underground in a belt running from the Gdansk area of northern Poland diagonally southeast to the country’s border with Ukraine–results so far already have whetted the appetite of energy companies such as Exxon Mobil Corp. (XOM), Chevron Corp. (CVX), Marathon Oil Corp. (MRO) and Talisman Energy Inc. (TLM.T TLM)–which have acquired exploration concessions–as well as oil-field-services giants such as Halliburton Co. (HAL), Schlumberger Ltd. (SLB), Baker Hughes Inc. (BHI) and Weatherford International Ltd. (WFT), which hope to work for them.

But before Poland can collect any windfall hydrocarbon profits and free itself from dependence on Russia for its natural-gas supply, it needs to address a number of obstacles, including acquiring drilling equipment and pipeline infrastructure to take the natural gas to customers around Poland and abroad and, above all, labor.

Outside the U.S., Poland is the first place where companies are making a serious effort to develop shale gas.

“It’s easy to find work nowadays,” says Waclaw Klimek, a student at Akademia Gorniczno-Hutnicza, a Polish technical university known for its mining and oil and natural-gas specializations.

“In two years, the boom will really start, just as we’ll be finishing up school,” adds Marta Cyz, another AGH student, who with Klimek was manning the registration desk at the second International Geosciences Student Conference in Krakow, which doubled as a job fair.

Shale oil and natural gas are little different from their conventional counterparts, being produced by the same processes. The major difference is that conventional oil and gas deposits are the result of the fossil fuel pooling in an impermeable basin or bubble of rock, while shale deposits are still trapped in the sponge-like semipermeable rock itself. While conventional drilling seeks to tap an underground pool, shale deposits involve the fracturing of underground rock to release these deposits.

“We know there is gas,” says Kamlesh Parmar, the country manager of Lane Energy, a company specializing in exploring for unconventional hydrocarbon sources and the furthest advanced among companies exploring for shale gas in Poland. “The question now is: How much is there, what is the quality, can we get it out and how much will it cost?”

To extract the volumes cited in the U.S. Department of Energy report, tens of thousands of production wells would need to be drilled in Poland, says Niall Rowantree, an upstream research analyst at Wood Mackenzie in Edinburgh. Only a handful have been drilled so far.

Recruiters are already actively in touch with Poles working in oil towns across the world, in Houston; Aberdeen, Scotland; Calgary, Alberta; and in Norway to persuade them to move back to Poland, Kostecki says. Some have been away for 30 years.

Meanwhile, Polish natural-gas monopoly PGNiG SA, which for decades was the only game in town if one wanted to work in oil-and-gas extraction in Poland, now has a poaching problem.

“Geofizyka Torun, [a PGNiG subsidiary] took everyone who applied [this year],” says Piotr Kurnik, the coordinator of the AGH conference and a third-year student at AGH.

The company is looking for surveyors and project operators, as well as title negotiators, who get the owners of concessioned land to allow companies to conduct their seismic readings on their property, whether through a sale of the land, a lease or some other arrangement. While Poland’s government owns the rights to all the minerals under Polish territory, it doesn’t own the land itself. Dealing sometimes with thousands of individual landholders means title negotiation over an area to be explored or exploited often moves at a snail’s pace.

Business is picking up, but Geofizyka Torun is facing increasing competition as rival companies set up shop in Poland, bringing their own equipment to do seismic testing and hiring young professionals, says Sylwia Kowalska, a human-resources director at the company. But Geofizyka Torun offers to pay for its employees’ lodgings and provides them with English classes, she says.

“We’re seeing employees who left coming back,” Kowalska says. “They miss Poland.” She estimates that in May the company hired at least 70% more people than a year ago.

Geofizyka Krakow, another PGNiG subsidiary, does subcontracting jobs all over the world and recruits oil and gas workers in many different countries, including Pakistan, Egypt and Canada. But one of its toughest tasks is hiring people in Poland itself, says Filip Rieger, Geofizyka Krakow’s chief recruitment coordinator. Those conducting mining-related work need permits from the State Mining Authority to do so. These permits are awarded for different grades of expertise, depending on age, experience and education. “In Poland, the required permits limit the pool of applicants,” Rieger says.

Meanwhile, Chevron’s Polish operations will “require scaling up” if initial drilling results are positive, but the company isn’t currently experiencing labor shortages, says John Claussen, Chevron Upstream Europe’s Poland country manager.

“We are aware there are good universities turning out promising graduates and we have already hired four new engineers in-country to help meet our own internal needs,” Claussen says.

 

Source: Wall Street Journal

Tagged with:
preload preload preload